Contract Disputes in Virginia and Maryland:

Breach of Contract, Fraud, Construction law, Cargo claims, Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices, Unjust Enrichment, Freight Charges & Collection on Open Accounts

Contract disputes arise when two parties to a contract disagree as to the duty imposed on them by a material term in the contract, or when two parties disagree that a contract was formed, or when one party alleges that the other party has breached the contract by its acts or omissions.

Contract disputes involving substantial damages can arise whether or not there is a written contract, and in all areas of life, whether in the field of commerce, construction, government, consumer products, lending, entertainment, transportation, employment, or any field of activity in which people make contracts.

If you need legal assistance with a contract dispute, the experienced Virginia & Maryland contract dispute lawyers of the SRIS Law Group, P.C. stand ready to institute and pursue lawsuits on your behalf, or to defend you against suit by another.  The Virginia & Maryland contract dispute lawyers of the SRIS Law Group, P.C. are skilled in Federal and State court litigation, from commencing suit to conducting discovery and depositions, filing and arguing motions, to civil jury trials.  The SRIS Law Group, P.C. Virginia & Maryland contract dispute attorneys will assist with zealous advocacy to protect your rights under the law.

The attorneys of the SRIS Law Group, P.C. are all experienced Virginia & Maryland contract dispute trial lawyers who will prepare to take your case to trial if necessary.

The Virginia & Maryland contract dispute attorneys at the SRIS Law Group, P.C. are skilled negotiators.  They will work to achieve an agreed-upon settlement before trial for you wherever a favorable outcome is possible.

VIRGINIA CASE FOR CONTRACT LITIGATION

Facts:

Haley, who sold his company to Kamlar, and was then retained as manager, returned for credit a hydraulic pump which he thought was not included in the property sold.  He was fired by Kamlar’s President although he offered to reimburse the corporation if the directors determined the pump did not belong to him and after he refused to sign a confession and resignation.  The Haley alleged that the Kamlar breached an employment contract when it terminated the employee. The Jury returned a verdict for compensatory and punitive damages against Kamlar after Instructions 13 and 14 by the Trial Court concerning punitive damages.  The jury returned a verdict in favor of the employee, awarding punitive damages for the breach of contract.

Click on above link to read more.

MARYLAND CASE FOR CONTRACT LITIGATION

Facts:

Mr. Stone, the appellant, purchased a home in Washington, D.C. for $ 285,000. James E. Savitz and his law firm were employed by Stone to handle the settlement of that purchase, including the examination of the title of the property for marketability, document preparation, the release of any liens encumbering the property, and obtaining a title insurance policy. Mr. Stone applied to Maryland National Bank for a home equity loan in the amount of $ 50,000 to purchase “stock puts” to protect his financial position in the stock market in response to anticipated margin calls on certain stocks he had purchased on credit.

Click on above link to read more.