Get Adobe Flash player

Amp

Internet Defamation Libel Slander Virginia Maryland Lawyers Attorneys

Defamation on the Internet

Virginia & Maryland Internet Defamation Attorneys

Defamation is spoken or written words that falsely and negatively reflect on a person’s reputation.  If someone has said or written something about you to the detriment of your reputation, they have defamed you.  Slander is the spoken form of defamation, and libel is the written form of defamation.

With so much communication taking place through digital media, with the rise of social networking websites, and with so much information being placed on the internet, it is entirely possible for one person to defame another on the internet.  Internet and digital communications are in no way exempt from the traditional law of defamation.

If you feel you have suffered defamation on the internet and wish to seek legal redress, call the Virginia & Maryland internet defamation lawyers of the SRIS Law Group.  Based on their years of experience in State and Federal Court litigation, the Virginia & Maryland internet defamation attorneys at the SRIS Law Group, P.C. will work to vindicate your reputation discretely, promptly, and forcefully.

VIRGINIA INTERNET DEFAMATION

Opinion Summary:

Speech concerning the official conduct of public figures is especially protected, and such figures seeking judgment in a defamation action must prove, in addition to an actionable statement and publication, malicious intent.

Facts:

According to the Complaint, the website “May4thCounts.com” publishes “certain information which is slanderous and libelous with regard to City Councilman.” It is also alleged that this information “relate[s] directly to the powers and responsibilities of the Councilman.” The website’s information is clearly designed to dissuade voters from supporting the Plaintiff’s reelection.

Holding:

The Supreme Court of Virginia has held that “discussion of public issues and debate on the qualifications of candidates for public office are integral to the operation of our system of government and are entitled to the broadest protection the First Amendment can afford.” Further, speech concerning the official conduct of public figures is especially protected, and such figures seeking judgment in a defamation action must prove, in addition to an actionable statement and publication, malicious intent.  The only evidence before the Court that could speak to the intent of the publishing defendant is the content of May4thCounts.com. The Court is unable to find, without additional information, actual malice in this publication. The balance, then, between the freedom of expression guaranteed by our Constitution and holding one responsible for abuse of that freedom is found not by prohibiting the expression ex parte, but by testing its use in a judicial proceeding in which all parties have the opportunity to be heard.

MARYLAND INTERNET DEFAMATION:

Opinion Summary:

In a defamation case involving anonymous Internet posters, the trial court abused its discretion by denying the publisher’s motion for a protective order with regard to the claimant’s request for the identifying information of the anonymous posters as, by failing to state a claim for defamation, U.S. Const. amend. I, protected their identity.

Issue:

The case involved a question of first impression as to the process by which a claimant could discover the identifying information about anonymous Internet posters.

Fact:

The claimant asserted that the postings made by the John Does accused him of maintaining unsanitary food service establishments and of setting fire to a historic home. The trial court granted the publisher’s motion to dismiss but ordered it to comply with the claimant’s subpoena and reveal identifying information regarding some of the John Does from its records.

Holding:

The court held that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the publisher’s motion for a protective order, because when it compelled the identification of the John Does, the claimant had not pled a valid defamation claim against any of them. The court set forth guidance to trial courts addressing similar matters and the standard to be employed when balancing an individual’s First Amendment, U.S. Const. amend. I, right to speak anonymously on the Internet against a plaintiff’s right to seek judicial redress for defamation.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content

Arbitration Virginia Maryland Mediation Alternative Dispute Resolution

Arbitration in Virginia and Maryland

Arbitration is a procedure in which a dispute is submitted, by agreement of the parties, to one or more arbitrators who make a binding decision on the dispute.  In choosing arbitration, the parties opt for a private resolution procedure instead of choosing the public court system.  An existing dispute can be referred to arbitration by agreement of the parties.  Once arbitration is commenced, a party cannot unilaterally withdraw from arbitration.

Mediation, by contrast, is a voluntary process in which two or more parties involved in a dispute work with an impartial party, the mediator, to generate their own solutions in settling their conflict.   Unlike a judge or an arbitrator whose decisions may subject one party to win and the other party to lose, mediation is about finding a solution that works for both parties.  Mediation is essentially facilitated negotiation.

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), whether Arbitration or Mediation, is an ever-expanding reality in business and other civil disputes.  Many contracts require Arbitration instead of litigation in the courts.  Some contracts require Mediation before a party can initiate suit for breach.

Arbitration and Mediation require a detailed knowledge of the law applicable to a given case, knowledge of ADR procedures, as well as experience in litigation and negotiation.  Based on their years of experience in Arbitration and Mediation, the Virginia & Maryland attorneys at the SRIS Law Group, P.C. will represent your interests with determination and professionalism.

VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND CODE FOR ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION

Va. Code Ann. § 8.01-581.02 Proceedings to compel or stay arbitration

A. On application of a party showing an agreement described in § 8.01-581.01, and the opposing party’s refusal to arbitrate, the court shall order the parties to proceed with arbitration. However, if the opposing party denies the existence of the agreement to arbitrate, the court shall proceed summarily to the determination of the issue of the existence of an agreement and shall order arbitration only if found for the moving party.

B. On application, the court may stay an arbitration proceeding commenced or threatened on a showing that there is no agreement to arbitrate. Such an issue, when in substantial and bona fide dispute, shall be forthwith and summarily tried and the stay ordered if found for the moving party. If found for the opposing party, the court shall order the parties to proceed to arbitration

C. If an issue referable to arbitration under the alleged agreement is involved in an action or proceeding pending in a court having jurisdiction to hear applications under subsection A of this section, the application shall be made therein. Otherwise, subject to § 8.01-581.015, the application may be made in any court of competent jurisdiction.

D. Any action or proceeding involving an issue subject to arbitration shall be stayed if an order for arbitration or an application therefor has been made under this section. However, if the issue is severable, the stay may be with respect thereto only. When the application is made in such action or proceeding, the order for arbitration shall include the stay.

E. An order for arbitration shall not be refused on the ground that the claim in issue lacks merit or bona fides or because any fault or grounds for the claim sought to be arbitrated have not been shown.

Md. COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Code Ann. § 3-206 Validity of arbitration agreements; agreements between employers and employees

(a) Validity. — Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, a written agreement to submit any existing controversy to arbitration or a provision in a written contract to submit to arbitration any controversy arising between the parties in the future is valid and enforceable, and is irrevocable, except upon grounds that exist at law or in equity for the revocation of a contract.

(b) Agreement between employers and employees. — This subtitle does not apply to an arbitration agreement between employers and employees or between their respective representatives unless it is expressly provided in the agreement that this subtitle shall apply.

Disclaimer

GENERAL DISCLAIMER

This Website is intended solely to convey general information about Sris Law Group P.C. The content of the Website is not intended to constitute, and should not be relied upon as, legal advice. While we have attempted to maintain the information on this Website as accurately as possible, this information may contain errors or omissions, for which we disclaim any liability. Sris Law Group P.C.  does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any other Website which the user may access through this Website.

For your protection, if you contact us through this Website, please do not send us any confidential information unless you have received written permission, in advance, to do so from a Sris Law Group P.C. attorney.

The confidentiality of any communication between you and Sris Law Group P.C. may not be protected until an attorney-client relationship is formally established. Neither your use of this site nor your transmission of electronic mail to Sris Law Group P.C. nor any of its lawyers will create an attorney-client relationship.  The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires satisfaction of multiple factors such as resolution of possibleconflicts of interest, an appropriate fee arrangement, and mutual agreement on the terms of the engagement.  In the absence of such a relationship, materials you send to us may not be protected by the attorney-client privilege, and third parties may be able to force Sris Law Group P.C. to reveal the information you send to us.

This Website should not be interpreted as an offer by Sris Law Group P.C. or any of its attorneys to practice law in any jurisdiction in which the Firm or the attorneys are not properly authorized to do so.   The listing of an area of practice by Sris Law Group P.C. or a Sris Law Group attorney, unless otherwise indicated in an individual attorney biography, does not indicate any certification, expertise, specialization, or special authority therein.

Any uses of the content of this Website, other than personal use, without prior written permission from Sris Law Group P.C., are prohibited.

PRIVACY POLICY

Sris Law Group P.C. respects the privacy of visitors to our Website. In general, you can visit our Website without telling us who you are or revealing any personal information about yourself. We track the Internet addresses of the domains from which people visit us and analyze these data for trends and statistics, but the individual users remains anonymous. Sris Law Group P.C. does not collect personally identifying information from site visitors without their permission and unless offered in the context of an existing or potential representation or other service. You may be asked to provide personally identifying information, such as your name and address, if, for example, you send us electronic mail or sign up to receive a free subscription to a Sris Law Group P.C. newsletter. We recognize and appreciate the importance of responsible use of such information, and will not use information provided by you except to respond to your direct inquiries. Sris Law Group P.C. does not share any of this information with third parties, except as may be required by law, and will take appropriate steps to protect the information you share with us from unauthorized access or disclosure.

DISCLAIMERS REQUIRED UNDER STATE LAW

This Website may be considered an advertisement for Sris Law Group P.C. in certain jurisdictions. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you written information about our qualifications and experience.

No attorney listed on this Website, unless otherwise indicated in an individual attorney biography, is certified as an “expert” or “specialist” pursuant to any authority governing the practice of law in Virginia , Maryland , Massachusetts , New York , California , or North Carolina .

California Business and Professional Code rules require a restatement that all results of cases portrayed on this Website were dependent on the facts of those cases, and “that the results will differ if based on different facts.”

New York rules require a statement that prior results cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter, including your case, in which the Sris Law Group P.C. or any of its attorneys may be retained.”

This web site may be considered “advertising” under Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rules.

To the extent the State Bar rules requires us to designate a principal office and/or single attorney responsible for this site, Sris Law Group P.C. designates Atchuthan Sriskandarajah of the Fairfax Virginia Office as the responsible attorney.

Sris Law Group P.C. and its attorneys handle or welcome cases, but, unless otherwise indicated in an individual attorney biography, are not “specialists” in a specific service, field, or area of law

Sris Law Group P.C. reserves the right to change any portion of this Disclaimer at any time without advance notice.  Please check this page periodically for changes.  This Policy was last updated in January 2011.

This weblog is made available by the attorney publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give information, opinions and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this weblog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case. Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken by our firm.

This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or Advertising Material under the Rules of Professional Conduct governing lawyers in Maryland, New York, California, North Carolina, Massachusetts, & Virginia.

VA & MD Offices

Virginia

Fairfax County 703-278-0405
Prince William County 703-278-0405
Loudoun County 703-278-0405
Fredericksburg 703-278-0405
Richmond 804-201-9009
Virginia beach 757-512-5002
Lynchburg 434-509-4004

Maryland

Rockville 240-399-0304
Baltimore 240-399-0304
 

8:00 AM – 12:00 AM Midnight

Contact Us

First Name:
Last Name:
Email @:
Phone #: --
Message: or call us 1.888.437.7747 Click To Chat

VA & MA Civil Litigation Lawyer

Atchuthan Sriskandarajah on Channel 7 News
 

OUR VIRGINIA OFFICES

 

Fairfax Office

 

Loudoun Office

 

Manassas Office

 

Virginia Beach Office

 

Fredericksburg Office

 
  4008 Williamsburg Court
Fairfax, Virginia 22032
Phone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
  201-F Royal Street, SE
Leesburg , Virginia 20175
Phone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
  10432 Balls Ford Rd; Suite 300
Manassas, Virginia 20109
Telephone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
  1 Columbus Center
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462
Phone: 757-512-5002
Get Direction
  12000 Kennedy Lane, STE 106
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22407
Phone: 703-278-0405
Get Direction
 
                     
         

OUR MARYLAND OFFICES

 
 

Richmond Office

 

Lynchburg Office

 

Baltimore Office

 

Rockville Office

 
  7400 Beaufont Springs Drive,
Suite 300 Richmond, Virginia 23225
Phone: 804-201-9009
Get Direction
  1022 Court Street
Lynchburg, Virginia 24504
Phone: 434-509-4004
Get Direction
  400 East Pratt Street, 8th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21202
Phone: 240-399-0304
Get Direction
  1 Research Court, Suite 450
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Phone: 240-399-0304
Get Direction